Zdenka Podkapova

Freetour offers: There's two pages to the tour and while you'll be left in absolutely no doubt about just how gorgeous Miss Podkapova is, the tour doesn't give away a great deal in terms of how much content you'll find inside the website. The fact that the tour didn't even mention video content was alarming to say the least. The lack of large picture samples also had me concerned. It's worth heading to the join page and scrolling down to the bottom to see the bonus websites you'll be getting access to with your membership. I'll talk more about those sites later in the review, though.

General impression: I didn't get a great first impression. Sure, the shots on the tour are great but what is on offer? The tour certainly didn't make it clear. And I've been in some of the other websites affiliated with this one and a few of them really weren't up to part, so I didn't have particularly high hopes for Zdenka's website. Hopefully she'll prove me wrong.

Bravo's opinion:  What I noticed immediately upon logging into Zdenka Podkapova's website for the first time was the realization that my first impression was a correct one. This is extremely disappointing because Zdenka is absolutely gorgeous and I really was hoping to come across a quality website that would show off plenty of pictures and videos of her.

Don't get me wrong. There are some silver linings to this membership. It's not all bad. But there's just too many bad points versus too few good points for this site to be worthwhile in my opinion. I mean, the layout of the site is great. Finding your way around is simple. But when there's only 52 image galleries split into two separate archives and no videos, how difficult could it be?

What's worse, it doesn't even look as though Zdenka's website still updates. I would say it's been months at least since this member's area saw an update. But like I said, it's not all bad.

You'll remember me mentioning the bonus websites that you'll get access to with a membership to Zdenka's website. Well, all up there are 14 more websites. Of those 14 websites, 13 are other solo-pornstar websites and 1 is a pornstar megasite. The 13 pornstars you'll get access to are Anetta Keys, Brittney Skye, Crissy Moran, Evelyn Lory, Jana Cova, Kyla Cole, Mili Jay, Monica Hajkova, Silvia Saint, Susana Spears, Tawny Roberts and Veronika Zemanova. These sites all feature some really high quality photo content and most also have videos. But they've got the same problems as the Zdenka Podkapova website: not enough content and no updates.

Individually, I don't think any of those solo-pornstar websites are worth joining. Together, they make a much better case in terms of value for money. But it's the 14th bonus website you'll be getting access that really tips the scales and is in my opinion the of the lot: Pornstar Angels. Pornstar Angels certainly has no problem with a small archive of content. There's a mammoth amount of porn available for members within this website. Updates are frequent. When I say frequent, I mean almost daily. And the days where they do miss an update are usually preceded or followed by a day with multiple updates.

Inside you'll find picture galleries and videos from 84 different pornstars. Each pornstar obviously has at least 1 item of content, whether it be a picture gallery or a video. There's no easy way to find out how many of each other than counting them. So I took a look at 10 random pornstars and had a look what was available. On average, each contained 3 items of content with a decent enough volume of videos. Pornstar Angels really is an A-Z of pornstars with everyone from Aimee Sweet to Zoe Montada to choose from.

The resolution of the pictures varies depending on when the gallery was added. The oldest galleries have pictures that are just 800x600 in size and newer galleries step the resolution up as high as 1200x800 pixels.

Video quality also varies a lot. Some of the high quality stuff is 720 x 576 pixels and is encoded at a huge bit rate of 2376kbps (2.3Mbps). Some videos are just 640 x 480 and others are as small as 320 x 240 pixels. It's a real mixed bag in terms of quality.