For ‘orgy’ read ‘threesome’ or ‘solo.’ That’s my first grumble with First Gay Orgy, these are threesome scenes, well, there are 40 threesome videos with galleries and five solo galleries. Not exactly what I would call an orgy site. My next grumble is that nothing has been added since January 2007 and there is no news of what’s going on.
Enter First Gay Orgy →

Content Quality: 14.0 / 20
Quantity/Volume: 14.0 / 20
Updates Frequency: 10.0 / 20
Value for Money: 15.0 / 20
Reviewer Opinion: 15.0 / 20

68/100

First Gay Orgy

First Gay Orgy Site Facts

Pictures 45 Galleries	Videos 40 Galleries 320x240 pixels Windows 540 Kbps (downloadable) Full Scenes: Yes Video Captures: Yes DRM: No
Exclusive Most content is exclusive	Updates No updates
Cost Trial: $1.95 3 days, recurs $39.95/mo Monthly: $34.95 30 days Multi-Mo: $59.95 3 Months (non-recurring)	Billing CCBill, Epoch Credit Card Online Check

First Gay Orgy Review

It’s very odd that First Gay Orgy is a lone site in a network of straight sites. Perhaps it was an experiment that went wrong, which would account for the lack of episodes. Maybe they couldn't find more than three boys at a time to take part which is why these are threesomes and not orgies – where you would expect at least four guys per scene. Maybe you consider threesomes to be orgies? Maybe I should quit whining and tell you what’s good here…

Some of the boys are dishy and sexy and the photos, especially the more recent ones, are a good quality. The top size I found was 1064 x 1600, and the older ones were not much smaller. So how come the videos are down at 540kbps @ 320 x 240? Actually that is the ‘higher’ version of the older scenes. The last scene to be uploaded was at a bigger and better 1.13mbps @ 520 x 416, and these were all WMV streams or downloads. They were also clips only with no full scene to grab in one go, and the low quality versions were simply not viewable at all. The sex is hot though, made hotter by some of the amateur looking younger guys.

Basically you start straight in on a scene with three guys on the sofa or the bed, they start kissing and then we’re away. Not much in the way of storyline here so you are straight into the action. And this action does include group sucking, oral and anal too with nicely sticky cum shots at the end. You can always comment on what you see and rate it, then you can add your favourites to their own little area and build up a stock of the best scenes. Some scenes have 18 clips to them, but then these would only be a minute long; other scenes have fewer clips but they run for a longer time, say two minutes. Either way it’s still a rather clumsy way of viewing movies.

Here is an interesting thing which may tell you something. The first scene to appear at First Gay Orgy was put up in 2004, as of today (August 2009) it has received two votes; that’s two members who were bothered enough to give it a rating, and they gave it a score of two out of five. Make of that what you will.

So, sorry, but I was not impressed with this site. I felt that it was a gay site simply put up in a straight network to… well I don’t know why really. It will appeal to guys who are more bi than gay, as they can at least go and view the straight bonuses, which number 24 and which mainly get updated. Or, if you’re straight and curious about the gay thing then sign up without concern as you will also be able to view the straight sites.

Conclusion: 68/100
There are not many episodes here and they are threesomes rather than orgies. The quality is mediocre to say the least, though the more ‘recent’ videos are better. The galleries are good, clear and digital, the boys are mostly young and sexy too. But there hasn’t been an update for many years, and I reckon it’s safe to assume that the site is dead in the water. You do get bonus sites – all straight – and there are feed sites, manly straight with some gay. So for gay guys, not a good move, for bi or gay curious straight guys, a better move.